Re: [ga] Change from without and within

[eric@hi-tek.com]

perhaps you missed my post for outcry?
Eric

Jeff Williams wrote:

> Eric and all assembly members,
>
>   Actually, to answer your question, yes, plain enough, but not quite
> complete enough.
>
>   If the ICANN BoD has voted to adopt the "Blueprint", or
> as our members characterize it as the "Black-and-Blueprint"
> than DOC/NTIA, not DOC BTW, will as in the past thus far
> also adopt this "Black-and-Blueprint" unless there is such
> an uprising from members here and from many other groups,
> constituencies of the DNSO, the ASO/PSO members,
> the NIC's, ISP's, ccTLD's independently and on mass,
> and frankly many many stakeholders/users/domain name
> holders, there will be no reverse from WITHIN ICANN
> here...
>
>   Given this than, change will have to come strictly from
> without...  So, DNSO GA members is loosing one more
> important battle baring a miracle, but the war rages on...
>
> eric@hi-tek.com wrote:
>
> > I have certainly read them and want to make very clear that that is not an
> > internal document nor has it the legal authority to adjust contracts.  We
> > should stand pat on our hand and require a modification agreement from the DoC
> > before changing our activities.  Anyone who follows it without the agreement
> > of the USG is in serious violation of a supply contract with the USG.  So if
> > TR goes about changing things before this is agreed to he will be answerable
> > under ISOs to the DoC.  Plain enough?
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > Jeff Williams wrote:
> >
> > > Eric and all assembly members,
> > >
> > >   Obviously you have not read the "Blueprint" from the ICANN
> > > Staff which the ICANN BoD approved in Bucharest just yesterday.
> > > "Uncivilized" is seemingly in vogue with ICANN these days...
> > >
> > > eric@hi-tek.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would suggest that until our charter is changed or pursuant to our own
> > > > rules we change the procedure that no one take unilateral action to
> > > > change anything within the GA.
> > > >
> > > > Whatever effect it has on the outside will be determined in the proper
> > > > fashion.
> > > >
> > > > Anything else would be uncivilized.
> > > >
> > > > Eric
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > --
> > > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > > E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> > > Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> > > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html