Re: [ga] Re: news from bucharest: at large exists again

[Marc Schneiders <marc@fuchsia.bijt.net>]

Jefsey,

I am not sure I follow you. I think it is time to stop reading meanings
into each others messages. The point is:

1. Did you ask for inclusion in the list on http://www.at-large.org?
2. Were you rejected?
3. Did you receive any explanation of that rejection?

-- 
M

On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, at 20:39 [=GMT+0200], J-F C. (Jefsey)  Morfin wrote:

> On 18:48 01/07/02, Thomas Roessler said:
> >On 2002-07-01 18:18:06 +0200, Marc Schneiders wrote:
> >>If I am not mistaken, Jefsey told us he was rejected. So what now?
> >
> >Look at the details of that rejection, and find out whether or not
> >it was the right thing to do.  For instance, what kind of substance
> >do the associations he's talking about have?  What have they
> >accomplished and done so far?
>
> I do thank you Thomas for falling into the trap. I expected it to be tough
> to demonstrate that the decision was subjective. Actually we see now that
> it is more than subjective, it is according to an effective procedure. I
> had never been told there was a documented rejection: now we all know it.
> We were never made aware that there was a decision committee: now we know
> that Thomas is a Member. We were never made aware there were rules: now we
> know that they have been rightfully followed. We were never made aware
> there was an administrative registration file: now we know that we had to
> substantiate our incorporation date, legal publication reference, BoD list
> etc... may-be who knows? No one, but Thomas....
>
> I am sad Thomas that you were entrapped into that. You are worth more.
> jfc
>
> PS about what we have done so far? a few things actually, but among them we
> havd a few disagrements with Thomas Roessler.
>
>
>
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html