ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] OECD vs ICANN, re: WHOIS accuracy



On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Kent Crispin wrote:

> This is circular reasoning.  The main reason for lack of effectiveness of
> DNS whois in finding problems is *precisely* that DNS whois is not
> maintained very well, and is very easy to fake.  This is exactly the
> question at issue.  *If* DNS whois were accurate, then it would be a
> highly effective way to reach the problem source.

Garbage.  There is no such thing as the DNS whois.  I think i've only
found this beast in the fairy land called ICANN.  Like I said earlier -
this argument is a red herring.

joe baptista
www.dot-god.com



--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>