Re: [ga] Once more into the breach....

[Don Brown <donbrown_l@inetconcepts.net>]

I tend to agree.

The statements and conclusions in the post in question made absolutely
no sense. Rather, it screamed that the writer didn't possess a
rudimentary understanding of the very basic elements of WLS.

There is a wealth of pertinent information already published and
readily available on the web, including VeriSign's proposal and
amendments, MP3s and written minutes of meetings and the TTF's
several published works, et al. The archives of the GA list
also contain extensive information accumulated over the past several
months. Many of those posts and publications include links to
supporting information, as well.

I don't think a new/different web site will cure what ails the writer
in question. Initiative is a more compelling prescription, but only
he can help himself with that.

Thanks,


Saturday, July 27, 2002, 4:15:15 PM, William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info> wrote:

WXW> It's about personal responsibility, Danny, not hand holding.

WXW> That could take many forms, including asking questions, especially
WXW> before jumping to conclusions and making strong statements regarding
WXW> policy as the individual in question here has been doing.

WXW> Saturday, July 27, 2002, 2:09:16 PM, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

>> William ,

>> anyone coming to to this forum has a knowledge of the issues.  If you've been 
>> burned by a bad transfers situation, you surely know what the issue is, and 
>> clearly you have an interest in the issue... but that doesn't mean that you 
>> have a full understanding of relevant contracts or registrar processes.  I 
>> would like to think that there should be some other manner by which 
>> participants can be brought up to speed other than merely pointing them to 
>> the registrar's list, for example, and telling them to review the last three 
>> thousand comments spread over two years.

>> We have the capability of becoming a resource center that can aggregate 
>> background materials and documents to rapidly facilitate the learning 
>> process.  This will become highly important when the policy-development 
>> process moves into high gear -- the 30-45 day cycle proposed by the ERC.  If 
>> such preparatory work is not done, then no task force or working group to be 
>> convened will ever be sufficiently informed to get the job done, and this 
>> organization will become no more than a collection of a few knowledgable 
>> technocrats making decisions for the rest of the world.

>> --
>> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
>> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
>> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html








----
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA     Internet Concepts, Inc.
donbrown_l@inetconcepts.net         http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55              (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate
----

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html