Re: [ga] Re: ICANN & transfers

["vinton g. cerf" <vinton.g.cerf@wcom.com>]

At 05:31 PM 7/31/2002 +1200, Joop Teernstra wrote:
>At 09:37 p.m. 30/07/2002 -0400, vinton g. cerf wrote:
>
>>the information I have seems to show that these specifics are in the
>>contract between registrars and registry at least for the particular
>>case of .com/.net/.org so ICANN does not have 3rd party standing to
>>intervene for that case. The newer gTLD contracts are a bit more
>>refined.
>
>The newer gTLD contracts do they include the ccTLD's that Verisign has bought? (.tv  .bz e.a.)
><snip>

no I don't think so becaue VeriSign is not under contract to ICANN to operate these -
it is under contract to whoever is responsible for those ccTLDs.


>>It looks so me as if we need something more refined than dis-
>>accreditation as the principal tool providing incentive to adhere
>>to contract terms.
>
>fines?
>
>And to whom will the cost of both the policing and the compliance be passed on?

that's one of the reasons there probably are no more refined mechanisms 



>--Joop

Vint Cerf
SVP Architecture & Technology
WorldCom
22001 Loudoun County Parkway, F2-4115
Ashburn, VA 20147
703 886 1690 (v806 1690)
703 886 0047 fax

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html