<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [ga] Please could Neulevel respond re: unexplained "unlocking" of names under investigation
- To: Gary Osbourne <gro@direct.ca>
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [ga] Please could Neulevel respond re: unexplained "unlocking" of names under investigation
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 20:01:54 -0700
- CC: ga@dnso.org, Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us, "halloran@icann.org" <halloran@icann.org>, loren.johnson@neulevel.biz, Legal@neulevel.biz, Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>, "Nancy J. Victory" <nvictory@ntia.doc.gov>, cathy Handley <chandley@ntia.doc.gov>, Don Evans <DEvans@doc.gov>, icann board address <icann-board@icann.org>
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <000601c2396d$d271ff60$5855fc3e@r6yll> <000f01c23965$c3397d00$5355fc3e@r6yll> <7153818879.20020801072438@wxweb.com> <000601c2396d$d271ff60$5855fc3e@r6yll> <4.3.1.20020801125941.00c33f00@mail.direct.ca>
- Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
Gary, Richard and all assembly members,
Despite Gary's continuing inane comments of a personal nature towards
myself regarding issues, I support Richard's insisting on getting
reasonable and direct honest answers to his very good questions.
Stakeholders have RIGHT to these answers as Nuelevel is under
contract to a corp., ICANN that is a public service corp.
Gary Osbourne wrote:
> cc's trimmed.
>
> At 11:01 AM 01/08/02 -0700, William X Walsh wrote:
>
> >You seem to think that they have some obligation to
> >give you the details of any transaction that you
> >decide to inquire about.
>
> NeuLevel has characterized their process as fair
> and equitable for all internet users. Richard
> Henderson (and if you can't tell the difference
> between him and Jeff Williams, I pity you) has
> pointed out examples where their processes seem
> to have been unfair or inequitable. Now if I
> find out that something I buy, or something I
> try to buy, is not as advertised, then you're
> damn right I'd ask the advertiser for an
> explanation. And you're also right, they can
> tell me to shove it, or they can ignore me,
> as they seem to be doing, or they can do any
> number of things, some of them hopefully more
> of a win-win for both parties.
>
> And if they tell me to shove it, or ignore
> me, or don't come up with what I think is at
> least a decent explanation, then I am free
> to claim that they are guilty of false
> advertising and perhaps take further action,
> perhaps via government authorities, perhaps
> by court action, perhaps a class action suit.
>
> In this case, I suppose that could include
> going to ICANN about it, but it appears
> that that is a waste of time. What is it
> now Richard, three months and counting? -g
>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|