Re: [ga] Text of Letter to U.S. Commerce Dept. on ICANN Reform

[William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>]

Thursday, August 01, 2002, 5:46:18 PM, Dan Steinberg wrote:

> ummmmmmm,
> Does this alll have to be about hidden meanings?

> is it not possible to agree that ICANN needs to be reined in without
> worrying about the motivation of the people saying so?

No, it isn't in this case, because the things these parties want moved
outside of ICANN's reach are the very things that SHOULD be in ICANN's
reach. They are not advocating for the changes we are, and we should
not support them simply because they are attacking ICANN, but because
we support the reasons behind the criticisms.

There are areas where ICANN needs to be reigned in. NONE of these
parties are talking about any of those areas, and no where in the
letter in question are those areas even mentioned.



-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Save Internet Radio!  
CARP will kill Webcasting!
http://www.saveinternetradio.org/


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html