Re: [ga] Re: Names Council Resolution on Reform

[Vittorio Bertola <vb@vitaminic.net>]

On Fri, 02 Aug 2002 15:14:10 -0700, you wrote:

>> If the Chinese are half as smart as I usually give them credit for, what
>> they will do is insist on two roots and an interoperability treaty.
>
>Possibly.
>
>> The point is that ICANN has no right to insist that there be only one root,
>
>The protocols require that there be only one root:
>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2826.txt

Do Chinese have a law that recognizes IETF's authority to require that
there be only one root? (Not that I like the "national roots" approach
- but, given ICANN's "evolution", it seems to me more and more
likely.)
-- 
vb.               [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<------
----------------------> http://bertola.eu.org/ <--------------------------
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html