<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] At-Large Supporting Organization
I am truly sorry but I must completely reject such a concept.
AL must control the board not some small insignificant group under it's control.
Danny where are you going with this?
This is truly the tail wagging the dog.
eric
DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
> Dear members of the Board,
>
> In your opinion, would it serve the purposes of the Corporation to create an
> additional Supporting Organization for the At-large?
>
> After a year's worth of intensive discussion and analysis, your own
> blue-ribbon committee headed up by the distinguished statesman, Carl Bildt,
> presented such a consensus-based recommendation to you (the ALSO), and we
> have not heard the nature of your objections, if any, to this concept. Such
> a Supporting Organization would allow every participant in the ICANN process
> to participate in the election of directors -- none would be
> disenfranchised, and you would put an end to the disparity between those
> electoral rights accorded to current stakeholders and the lack of such
> equivalent rights for the rest of the community.
>
> I would appreciate hearing your views.
>
> Best wishes,
> Danny Younger
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|