<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] ICANN reimbourse $75,000 to GAC for GAC Secretariat
Karl Auerbach wrote:
>
>While I may have certain complaints and concerns about the DNSO, the
>effectiveness of its administrative functions is not among them. I have
>been impressed with the ever-improving mechanisms that the DNSO has put
>into place: e-mail archives, audio recordings of meetings, etc.
>
But that's exactly the reason.
GAC incurs in a higher cost, and this will have to be refunded by ICANN, for
*not* providing mechanisms like e-mail archives, audio recordings of
meetings, etc.
I remember when unleaded gasoline was introduced: it had a higher price than
regular, due to the cost of *not* putting lead into it.
Regards
Roberto
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|