<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] One technical question.
Jim Fleming wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Sotiris Sotiropoulos" <sotiris@worldatlarge.org>
>Cc: <ga@dnso.org>
>Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 12:00 AM
>Subject: [ga] One technical question.
>
>
>
>
>>I wonder if anyone might be able to direct me to a table chart depicting
>>current/up to date Network Number Class Allocations? [I'm looking for a
>>breakdown similar to the one of page 23 of RFC 990]
>>
>>Jim Fleming, perhaps you can help? or someone else?
>>
>>Thanks in Advance,
>>
>>Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>>
>>
>>
>RFC 990 November 1986
>Network Numbers
>
>
> Network Totals
>
> Assigned for the ARPA-Internet and the DDN-Internet
>
> Class A B C Total
>
> Research 13 92 775 880
>
> Defense 9 19 45 73
>
> Government 1 15 97 113
>
> Commercial 3 4 5 12
>
> Total 26 130 922 1078
>
> Allocated for Internet and Independent Uses
>
> Class A B C Total
>
> Research 14 105 1681 1800
>
> Defense 9 20 47 76
>
> Government 1 17 98 116
>
> Commercial 3 12 3974 3989
>
> Total 27 154 5800 5981
>
> Maximum Allowed
>
> Class A B C Total
>
> Research 8 1024 65536 66568
>
> Defense 24 3072 458752 461848
>
> Government 24 3072 458752 461848
>
> Commercial 74 9214 1114137 1123394
>
> Total 126 16382 2097150 2113658
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Reynolds & Postel [Page 23]
>====
>
>This page ?
>
>Classes no longer apply...but one could analyze these allocations
>to greater depth and see that ISPs have a very small percentage of the space...
>http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
>
Thanks Jim. Loud and clear. I now understand that it's CIDR or
"supernetting" these days. FYI, I have been doing some homework on this
topic and I just read an excellent paper on the "Development of the
Regional Internet Registry System" in the Internet Protocol Journal:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/759/ipj_4-4/ipj_4-4_regional.html
I think it should be required reading for all participants/spectators in
and around the ICANN. Concise and punctillious.
The following excerpts caught my attention:
------------------
"Internationalization
While the engineering-driven need for topological address space
assignment was becoming clear, there was also an emerging recognition
that the administrative mechanisms of address space distribution needed
further development. A central system just would not scale for numerous
reasons, including:
Sheer volume
Distance from the address space consumers
Lack of an appropriate global funding structure
Lack of local community support
The need to change administrative procedures was formally recognized by
August 1990, when the Internet Activities Board published a message it
had sent to the U.S. Federal Networking Council, stating "it is timely
to consider further delegation of assignment and registration authority
on an international basis" (RFC 1174 -drafted by Vinton G. Cerf :
http://www.armware.dk/RFC/rfc/rfc1174.html)."
<snip- and then a little further on>
"Following the examples of RIPE NCC and APNIC, it was recommended that
management of IP address space then administered by the InterNIC should
be under the control of, and administered by, those that use it,
including ISPs, end-user organizations, corporate entities,
universities, and individuals."
-------------------
Now that ICANN at-large membership is now no longer an option... those
of us in North and South America can always become "individual" members
of ARIN for a mere $500 annual membership fee (sans IP allocations, of
course) see: http://www.arin.net/membership/index.html
Enough reading for one night.
Sincerely,
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|