RE: [ga] FYI: .org applicant comments (long)

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

Don't know - hence the question ;)

Seriously - I have zero awareness of the status of the R/RTK project and
the status of the individual contributions as each relate to what the
specific registry operators are actually doing with the code (or not
doing as the case may be). My request is simply to clarify which code
GNR is referring to in their supplemental response.



                       -rwr




"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright

Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog

Please review our ICANN Reform Proposal:
http://www.byte.org/heathrow


 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Wesson [mailto:wessorh@ar.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 5:00 PM
> To: Ross Wm. Rader
> Cc: 'Karen Elizaga'; 'DNSO General Assembly'
> Subject: RE: [ga] FYI: .org applicant comments (long)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ross,
> 
> Didn't GNR develop a epp tool kit in c++? and isn't this 
> toolkit available on the same page as yours?
> 
> -rick
> 
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> 
> > > From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org] On Behalf Of 
> > > Karen Elizaga
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 1:47 PM
> >
> > > HI Ross,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your follow up questions (which appear below).
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > Karen - thanks for the clarifications, these answers combined with 
> > your response to the ICANN staff (answering similar 
> questions) helped 
> > clear things up to a large degree for me.
> >
> > One statement in your supplemental response to the evaluation team 
> > jumped out at me however...
> >
> > "We alone have designed, developed and operated most of the SRS 
> > solutions internally, ranging from the EPP toolkit, protocol 
> > independent business logic and near-real time updates on DNS, Whois 
> > and MX. "
> >
> > The EPP toolkit that you reference above - is this the same 
> code that 
> > is being developed by the Universal R/RTK project over at 
> Sourceforge 
> > under a GPL license? 
> (http://sourceforge.net/projects/epp-rtk) or > has 
> > GNR opted 
> to instead provide a proprietary RTK to its registrars 
> > instead of the public version? What is the plan in this 
> regard if GNR 
> > is successful with the .org bid?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> >
> >                        -rwr
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the 
> shore like an 
> > idiot."
> > - Steven Wright
> >
> > Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog
> >
> > Please review our ICANN Reform Proposal: 
> http://www.byte.org/heathrow
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was 
> passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html