Re: [ga] Fwd: LACTLD comments on Zone Transfers

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

>We, on the other hand, think that it is just not realistic to think
>that anything resembling normal operation of a ccTLD could be attempted
>using the zone file alone. So, fears and hopes about what can be done
>with the zone file in terms of forced redelegations are, in our view,
>greatly exaggerated.

Unless ICANN has used that zone file data to slowly and quietly walk
through your WHOIS database to take a copy of all the ownership data as
well.

THEN you're ripe for a redelegation.

I wasn't happy with the way ICANN was being run 3 years ago. I'm even LESS
ahppy with what they've evolved into now. I wouldn't let them ANYWHERE NEAR
my zone files if I was running a ccTLD.

If I had a domain within a ccTLD, I'd be VERY UPSET with the delegated
authority if they were supplying ICANN with the full zone file.

Got that, Domainz/InternetNZ??? :^)


-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html