Re: [ga] Re: Antitrust Violations

[Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>]

Danny,

I can't support your motion because I'm not in-favor of the Constituency
concept. I lobbied strongly against the constituency model as far back as
'98 in Monterey Mexico, where we decided on equal representation in the
constituency model.

It hasn't worked, its not going to work.

-rick

On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> Rick,
>
> You may recall that the White Paper stated:  "Governance. The organizing
> documents (Charter, Bylaws, etc.) should provide that the new corporation is
> governed on the basis of a sound and transparent decision-making process,
> which protects against capture by a self-interested faction."
>
> Contracting parties are by definition a self-interested faction.  The recent
> ERC plan to change the voting structure of the GNSO allows for the
> decision-making process to be captured by this group of "contracting
> parties".  Why should we support this naked power grab that enhances the
> voting power of registries and registrars at the expense of the rest of the
> constituencies?
>
> You want a proposal?  Fine.  Adopt the proposed Resolution #2 cited at
> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc11/msg00044.html which deems any
> variation from the principle of equal stakeholder constituency representation
> and votes in the proposed GNSO council as unacceptable.
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html