Re: [ga] ICANN and the Representativeness of its Constituencies

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Michael and all assembly members,

  After reviewing from our {INEGroup] staff and members, including
other non members in the IT industry, your conclusions here Michael are
in short "ALL WET".  They are effectively slanting the representativeness
towards Registrars and Registries which in now real sense can represent
in name, the stakeholders/users.  Hence it is and still remains evident
that the obvious power play that your "Document" below suggests
inconsistent with the MoU and White paper as well as the skewed,
incomplete constituency model which has yet be be fully recognized
as the ICANN BOD and staff have denied other forming constituencies
from being "Officially recognized" or otherwise "ICANN Accredited".

Michael D. Palage wrote:

> Attached please find a pdf document that I am working on in connection with
> an audit regarding the representativeness of each of the ICANN DNSO
> constituencies. Any comments would be welcome.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michael D. Palage
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                                     Name: Representativeness-2.0.PDF
>    Representativeness-2.0.PDF       Type: Portable Document Format (application/pdf)
>                                 Encoding: base64

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html