Re: [ga] Overcoming IPv6 Security Threat

[Patrick <patrick@stealthgeeks.net>]

On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Allan Liska wrote:

> Eric,
>
> You don't care what he says, and yet you quoted his article, in
> full as support for your statement.  If you feel IPv6 is flawed and
> insecure, then rather than whining why don't you join the IETF IPv6
> working group and attempt to fix it?
>
> ISPs may be bought and sold, but I can assure you that network
> administrators who design the backbones for those ISPs are not bought and
> sold.
>
> But I will tell you what, I may be completely wrong about this, and you
> may be absolutely right...go ahead and post why you think IPv6 is flawed.
> In fact post it to Nanog...unless of course you realize that your position
> is untenable.

Please don't. NANOG is supposedly for operational and semi-operational
discussions, and discussions on the flaws or potential flaws of IPv6 from
a security perspective are more appropriate for the IETF or Bugtraq.

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
                               Patrick Greenwell
         Asking the wrong questions is the leading cause of wrong answers
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html