Re: [ga] IPv6 and child pornographers

[Joe Baptista <baptista@dot-god.com>]

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, J-F C. (Jefsey)  Morfin wrote:

> Now, Stephane; I did not read the paper of Joe. But there is in here a
> strong experience about layer  violations (not only at IETF layers 8 and
> 9). So I will not rebuke Joe and Jeff on this, but I will ask them how IPv6
> can affect security according them  (even if I see several ways, not
> specific to IPv6 but as drawback of the Internet architecture added to more
> possibilities).

I don't think IPv6 is good from a security point of view.  You'll have to
read my articles to see where I go with the argument on it.  I agree that
the IPv6 transport is more secure then IPv4.  It uses IPsec so you at
least have that going for you.  So I feel under those specific
circumstances that IPv6 is a privacy friendly protocol.

regards
joe baptista

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html