Re: [ga] Interesting WIPO ruling re: NewZealand.biz

[eric@hi-tek.com]

The cross over of reality to paper and vice versa is very hard for some.
Perhaps If they were not on payrolls and instead had to actually earn a living
they would understand.
Or perhaps if they had to pay the programmers salary they may have a fresher
concept of reality.
Or maybe if the were not schooled by Enron and Worldcom executives they would
get it.
It is always someone else's rights or other peoples money.
Eric

Andy Gardner wrote:

> At 11:16 AM -0700 10/14/02, kent@songbird.com wrote:
>
> >The text was about criteria for *registrants*, not *names*, and said
> >"organizations that didn't fit" -- ie, didn't meet the criteria.  It was
> >not about "names that didn't fit".  You (and Froomkin) can mince words
> >all day, but the meaning is quite clear, and you know it.
>
> Well, if the meaning was so "clear", why can we find entities other than
> "non profit organisations" using .org?
>
> History shows that your interpretation of these words differs greatly from
> the real deal.
>
> But you're being paid by ICANN to do what you do (even officially these
> days), so there's no puzzle as to why you take the road you're on. It just
> gets a bit old sometimes.
>
> --
> Andrew P. Gardner
> barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
> We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
> Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html