Re: [ga] Nuclear Threat from the ccTLDs

["Roberto Gaetano" <ploki_xyz@hotmail.com>]

Patricio Poblete wrote:
>
>This is partly inaccurate. Plan B is to have a ccTLD-run system to manage
>the part of the IANA database that refers to ccTLDs. (Note that this would 
>not
>be an alternate root, the idea would be to get the USG to accept this as 
>the
>authoritative source of information for ccTLDs in the A root.)
>

True, with an additional clause, that Plan B can work without risk for the 
stability of the Internet only if ICANN's "part" of the root will never have 
2-chars codes (please note that at any point in time a new country can be 
created, and ISO will allocate a new 3166 code for it, hence a potentially 
new ccTLD).
What I mean by this is that still there must be co-operation between ccTLDs 
and ICANN, or strict rules enforced (by whom?) on the entries in the A-root.

Regards
Roberto


_________________________________________________________________
Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband.  Join now! 
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html