<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Public comment period
Dear Marilyn & Tony
Time extension would be beneficial to get us all to review the final
reports and will provide many of us ample of comment opportuinity
in order to get all the angles covered well.
Regards,
Asaad Alnajjar
CEO Millennium Inc.
Los Angeles, CA, USA
At Monday, 2 December 2002, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>We have had two major task force final reports released on the same
day. We
>have been given a mere week to offer up public comments. This is
>inappropriate, and I would ask Marilyn Cade and Tony Holmes to voluntarily
>extend the comment period so that it accords with the recommendations
in the
>proposed bylaws -- twenty calendar days.
>
>It comes down to this -- is it more important to respect the public's
right
>to proper notice-and-comment provisions that offer a sufficient
amount of
>time to digest and respond to material that has been prepared over
the course
>of eighteen months, or is it more important to meet an extremely short
>arbitrary deadline that has been established for the sole convenience
of
>those who seek to deal with these particular issues at the upcoming
Amsterdam
>session?
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|