<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [ga] Open call to join
At 21:57 31/12/02, eric@hi-tek.com wrote:
>My question remains;
>Why has the Panel not done anything toward making this at-large into a
>formal group
>as they were elected to do? And why do the refuse to answer this
>question?
Because whatever/wherever you want to incorporate you need to tell what
for. This means a mission and a working style. Up to now no one was ever
able to sort it out. The Richard/Vittorio/Joop/Judyth proposition may help
to address that. We had a first try as a single standalone group (Joanna),
then an ICANN lobby (Hans) now we may perhap's proceed to the support of an
@large diversified community (we still have to sort out the
differing American Fededral top-down ("umbrella") and the European
Confederal peer tro peer ("concerting relations/"concertance") concepts, we
see in the proposed wordings.
jfc
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|