RE: [ga] WHOIS accuracy, and name deletions

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

At 3:58 PM -0600 1/9/03, Rodrigo  Orenday Serrato wrote:
>..by the way, spamming is penalized under laws as the one I refered in the
>quoted posting. That work for you?

Can you point me to the appropriate law in Mexico that prevents people in
Mexico from spamming?

Thanks,

>
>-----Mensaje original-----
>De: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]En nombre de Andy
>Gardner
>Enviado el: Jueves, 09 de Enero de 2003 02:41 PM
>Para: ga@dnso.org
>Asunto: RE: [ga] WHOIS accuracy, and name deletions
>
>
>At 1:24 PM -0600 1/9/03, Rodrigo  Orenday Serrato wrote:
>>Here's a thought I just came up with. If you've registered a domain name
>and
>>you actively use it for your website, and you have a number of pages in sai
>>website, perhaps it wouldn't be too much trouble to include one wherein
>>someone suing you as per the UDRP could serve the process on you and obtain
>>proof of service thereof.
>
>Great. Another easy way for spammers to bombard domain owners.
>
>--
>Andrew P. Gardner
>barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
>We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
>Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html