Re: [ga] WHOIS accuracy, and name deletions

["Dora Gerber" <doragerber@bluewin.ch>]

Dear Marilyn and all,

FYI - this is how the CH and LI people do it:

http://www.switch.ch/id/terms/policy.html

Regards, Dora Gerber


----- Original Message -----
From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>
To: "DPF" <david@farrar.com>; "Vittorio Bertola" <vb@bertola.eu.org>;
"Sabine van-almsick (E-mail)" <sabine.van-almsick@be.telekom.de>
Cc: <sri@domainmates.com>; <DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org>;
<discuss-list@opensrs.org>; <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 11:25 PM
Subject: RE: [ga] WHOIS accuracy, and name deletions


> David, you are a great resource to help us find out more about what ccTLDs
do... in this area.  Do you know what Domainz does? Is there a way to find
out what some of the larger ccTLDs do? Such as .de; .uk; .au; .fr; etc.?
Perhaps there is learning which the gTLDs can take from the ccTLDs. Many
ccTLDs have regisrtrations from other countries so have the postal delivery
issues as well.
>
> I'd be happy to post any relevant and factual responses we might be able
to get to the WHOIS TF list.
>
> Regards, Marilyn Cade
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DPF [mailto:david@farrar.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 2:47 PM
> To: Vittorio Bertola
> Cc: sri@domainmates.com; Cade,Marilyn S - LGA;
> DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org; discuss-list@opensrs.org; ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] WHOIS accuracy, and name deletions
>
>
> On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 12:15:40 +0100, Vittorio Bertola
> <vb@bertola.eu.org> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:19:59 +1300, you wrote:
> >
> >>If the registrant is a legitimate user, then once their domain stops
> >>working they will eventually contact the registrar to get it fixed.
> >
> >The problem is that it might be too late - you might already be losing
> >valuable e-mail messages or website traffic. So even before putting
> >the domain on hold all efforts have to be made to contact the
> >registrant and fix the problem (and let alone the fact that one has
> >the right not to expose his/her identity to the whole world).
>
> The issue of should you be allowed to be anonymous is a slightly
> different debate.  For now the policy is you need correct data and the
> issue is how to mitigate potential loss of a domain and purchase by
> someone else (which is far worse).
>
> I agree putting on hold is not without consequences and there should
> be a minimum of three attempts to contact the registrant.
>
> DPF
> --
> E-mail: david@farrar.com
> ICQ:    29964527
> MSN:    dpf666@hotmail.com
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html