Re: [ga] icannatlarge.com

[eric@hi-tek.com]

You are all right Mr. Younger,

one thousand members and growing!
Wow.
ease in integration is difficult.  Travesty is much more often
accomplished.
Perhaps the icannatlarge.com is not interested?
Perhaps it would be better for ICANN to ignore them like inclusive roots
and
IPv* whatever, and ccTLDs?

Sincerely,
eric

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> Alejandro,
>
> The ICANN Board called "upon the ICANN community to devote sustained energy
> to the creation of At Large structures..."   The ICANN community responded by
> creating icannatlarge.com which now has over 1000 registered members.
>
> While I have never been a member of this group, I do believe that they (as
> the only set of folks to proactively respond to the Board's call), have
> earned the right to a seat on the ALAC.  However, your Second Interim
> Implementation Report did not recommend that they be chosen as an ALAC member
> -- instead the proposal that you endorsed effectively eliminates their
> participation as it calls only for the five members of your Assistance Group
> to form the initial ALAC while awaiting the formation of regional councils
> from which ten additional members will be eventually be drawn.
>
> In light of their commitment to the ICANN process, and in light of the
> massive expenditure of human effort and energy that was required to build
> this organization at the behest of the Board, would it not be eminently
> appropriate for the Board to grant an ALAC seat to a representative of
> icannatlarge.com?
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html