Clean up your own mess before messing with others (Re: [ga] Re:ICANN & Stability)

[Marc Schneiders <marc@fuchsia.bijt.net>]

On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, at 17:48 [=GMT-0700], Karl Auerbach wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Alexander Svensson wrote:
>
> > This standoff is painted a bit too dramatic by both sides.
>
> I disagree; I find this issue to be extremely important from several
> points of view.  ICANN's claims are technically incorrect

As is it's own zonefile in comparison with the org zone as far as
nameservers is concerned. I have pointed this out before on this list. It
is still the case. Why don't they clean up their own mess before messing
with others?

How on earth can we let some body check our zones if it cannot do its own
right? And does not even correct it, after having been pointed to the
problem... ICANN seems completely deaf and incorrectible.

; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> icann.org. ns @ns.isi.edu

;; ANSWER SECTION:
icann.org.              1D IN NS        venera.isi.edu.
icann.org.              1D IN NS        ns.isi.edu.
icann.org.              1D IN NS        ns.ripe.net.
icann.org.              1D IN NS        ns.apnic.net.
icann.org.              1D IN NS        ns.icann.org.
icann.org.              1D IN NS        rip.psg.com.
icann.org.              1D IN NS        svc00.apnic.net.

; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> icann.org. ns @a.gtld-servers.net

;; ANSWER SECTION:
icann.org.              2D IN NS        NS.ISI.EDU.
icann.org.              2D IN NS        NS.RIPE.NET.
icann.org.              2D IN NS        RIP.PSG.COM.
icann.org.              2D IN NS        SVC00.APNIC.NET.
icann.org.              2D IN NS        VENERA.ISI.EDU.
icann.org.              2D IN NS        NS.APNIC.NET.


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html