ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Loss of voting rights, October 20, 2002


Thank you for the most inept thing I ever heard about ICANN. I suppose the 
ccTLDs IP addresses will be removed from the root master file on month 
after. May be we can close ICANN for Xmas?

On 17:34 01/10/02, DannyYounger@cs.com said:
>The Council Chair has posted the following notice.
>(excerpts):
>
>ISPCPC:
>Show-cause notice on July 18, 2002
>Final notice August 20, 2002
>Loss of voting rights, October 20, 2002
>ISPCPC amount owed $13.994 for 2002
>A 5% late fee of $699.70 was levied on 18 July, 2002.
>An additional 5% late payment fee of $ 699.70 for the final notice, August
>20.
>
>
>NCDNHC:
>Show cause notice on July 18, 2002
>Final notice August 20, 2002
>Loss of voting rights, October 20, 2002
>NCDNHC amount owed $13.774 fore 2002
>A 5% late fee of $699.20 was levied on 18 July, 2002.
>An additional 5% late payment fee of $ 699.20 (final notice)
>
>
>ccTLDs:
>Show cause notice July 18, 2002
>Final notice August 20, 2002
>Loss of voting rights, October 20, 2002
>ccTLD amount owed  $11,994.
>A 5% late fee of $599.70 levied on 18 July, 2002
>An additional 5% late payment fee of $ 524.75
>
>
>Conclusion
>**********
>
>Until payment is received for all past due amounts, including any late
>payment fees, the ccTLDs, NCDNHC, and ISPCPC will lose voting rights as of
>20 October 2002.  This will have an impact on the Names Council meeting on
>28 Oct 2002.
>
>Note that the lack of voting rights does not stop the participation of all
>constituencies in names council meetings.  I hope the non-voting
>constituencies will continue to participate actively in names council
>activities until (or if) the new GNSO and CNSO are formed.
>
>What I propose is that for any resolution that is voted on after 20 October
>2002, we note:
>(1) for, against, and abstentions for voting members which will decide names
>council resolutions in accordance with our rules of procedure and ICANN
>bylaws
>(2) for, against, and abstentions for non-voting members - this information
>will be made publicly available in the minutes of the names council
>
>Regards,
>Bruce Tonkin
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc11/msg00092.html
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>----------
>
>Had the ICANN Board approved the DNSO resolution to underwrite the costs of
>the DNSO Secretariat, we wouldn't now be in this predicament.  However, that
>particular effort was effectively sabotaged by the registrars and registries
>that through the Budget Advisory Committee recommended against any such
>financial support...
>
>What a wonderful affirmation of the concern of "contracting parties" for the
>needs of the user community.
>
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.391 / Virus Database: 222 - Release Date: 19/09/02


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>