Re: [ga] Overcoming IPv6 Security Threat

[Joe Baptista <baptista@dot-god.com>]

On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 eric@hi-tek.com wrote:

> Now I could be wrong here as I have only been invited to an Apnic meeting
> addressing such but it is my understanding that there is an actual campaign going
> on to try and market IPv6.  What I wondered is how they get to sell them.  It seems

I'm not sure about that.  So far I've seen alot of major players but no
major investment made by them in marketing to the consumer.

> like a tourist climbing into the Grand Canyon and collecting rocks and then selling
> them.  Or maybe more like a tourist going into Yellowstone and collecting Poison
> Ivy, and selling it to other tourists.  Where is the title to these addresses, or
> the license?  Are we talking Brooklyn Bridge here?

Good question - I've been asking myself who owns what.  Who owns IPv4 and
who owns IPv6.

regards
joe baptista

>
> Eric
>
> Joe Baptista wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Leah G wrote:
> >
> > > Very true, and one of the issues that some of us tried to address quite some
> > > time ago.  Small entities will find that costs will increase to an
> > > intolerable level due to overcharges that do nothing more than keep
> > > beaurocracies in place.   This is supposed to be the non-profit sector and
> > > there is no need for such pricing.  The end result is a manufactured "tax" on
> > > IP addressing, with tremendous profit built in as it goes downstream.
> >
> > according to vint cerf the fees support ICANN et al.
> >
> > >> On the assumption that some day all of Internet will be running IPv6,
> > >> one might ask what operational infrastructure including RIRs and parts
> > >> of ICANN will need to be supported. The fees may well change with time
> > >> as more IPv6 address space is allocated.
> >
> > > If IPV6 is the *answer* to the shortage of addressing, then there should be
> > > even less reason to overcharge for the allocations.
> >
> > I agree.  They should be given out for free just to get IPv6 off the
> > ground.
> >
> > regards
> > joe
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html