ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga-abuse] Re: [ga] Overcoming IPv6 Security Threat



On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 eric@hi-tek.com wrote:

> Let us see now.  What "supports" the use of Domain Names?  Could it be IP
> addresses?

yes - domain names are used to map resources to IP addresses - without IP
there would be no need for domain names.

> Could the cost and allocation of said IP addresses be relevant to the
> "support" of said names?

Yes and it's also going to affect our pocket book.  Forget IPv6 - just
look at whats happening to a dependent protocol IPv4.  At this time ARIN
and the other RIR's want $2,500 per /19 to /24 allocation.  That
translates into a cost to the user of $0.31 to $9.84 per IPv4 per year.

I think thats relevant.  Considering Vint Cerf has admitted it mainly to
fund ICANN and friends.

> Why would you and Alex be so determined to kill this discussion?  It is
> not like the GA is doing anything else under your leadership of demise.
> Me thinks the lady do protest too much.

Ya - I would like to know that too.  I welcome some reasons from those who
are in charge.  Dictates don't work well for me either.

regards
joe baptista

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>