ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Interesting WIPO ruling re: NewZealand.biz


If you were to appear before the IMPI and request the registration of
"paper" for paper products, registration would be denied, irrespective of
whether you intend to effectively use it as a trademark or not. Thefore you
could not obtain an exlusive right over the aforesaid term. And if granted
by mistake, such registration would be null.

Atentamente, Regards
Rodrigo Orenday Serratos


-----Mensaje original-----
De: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]En nombre de Andy
Gardner
Enviado el: Jueves, 10 de Octubre de 2002 04:54 PM
Para: ga@dnso.org
Asunto: RE: [ga] Interesting WIPO ruling re: NewZealand.biz


At 4:32 PM -0500 10/10/02, Rodrigo  Orenday Serrato wrote:
>Generics per se cannot be registered as trademarks, at least not under
>Mexican, French nor German trademark law, in their present state. There is
>an IP specialist here who declared to the press that he beleives that we
>should forget about domain names altogether and go back to IP addresses,
but
>I don't agree with that.

If he'd said "forget about trying to match domain names to TM's", I'd be
inclined to agree.

>However, an argument I sustained in my professional thesis on the
regulation
>of domain names in Mexico is the following:
>
>1. Mexican trade & service mark and copyright laws are of public interest,
>and they forbid the appropriation of generic terms, amongst others.

OK. With you so far.

>2. The Federal Civil Code sets forth that acts which contravene public
>interest laws shall be null.

Still with you.

>3. The registration of generics as domain names consists in an
appropriation
>of said terms, thus it contravenes the aforesaid laws.

Only if such registration is an attempt to use such a term as a trademark.
Mere registration of a generic term dosn't contravene.

>4. Consequently, said registrations are null.

So you're going to go to mercadolibre.com.mx and tell them they can't use
the name anymore?

>IP specialists here seem to agree. Constructive and reasonable comments on
>the foregoing are wellcome.

I don't think you and I are on the same planet, let alone in the same
country.

--
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>