ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] IPv6 and child pornographers


Yes, Lee's spelling is correct. Mine is a typo.

-James Seng

----- Original Message -----
From: "Soobok Lee" <lsb@postel.co.kr>
To: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
Cc: "James Seng" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>; "Joe Baptista"
<baptista@dot-god.com>; "General Assembly of the DNSO" <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] IPv6 and child pornographers


> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:11:18PM -0700, Jeff Williams wrote:
> > James Seng wrote:
> >
> > > "Security" is a loaded word, but to who involved in "Information
Security",
> > > there are five pillars, namely: Confidentity, Availability, Integrity,
> > > Privacy and Non-reputation.
> >
> >   Right here.  IPv6 does not meet any of these criterion adequately,
> > and several not at all.  Not at all are: Confidentity, and Privacy.
> > Not adequately: Information Security, Integrity and Non-reputation.
> > Although IPv6 come close to Non-reputation.
>
> I suggest simple correction:   Non-reputation ==>  non-repudiation .
> I guess there was transcription mistakes.
> If you both  have had other ideas about that term, correct me , please.
>
> Cheers.
> Soobok Lee
> an observer in Seoul
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>