ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Response to your posting on the NC List


Abel writes:  <<ICANN Council should have warned BOTH task-forces of the 
implications BEFORE the work started, since they knew policy changes were 
asked from those TF's, hence they should have given their position upfront, 
then
this would have been perhaps lead along "normal" paths.>>

Actually, ICANN staff was formally requested to provide such support almost 
12 months ago through the unanimous resolution passed by the Names Council at 
Marina del Rey:  “That the NC shows its support for the Transfer Task Force 
and the importance of its work. The NC requests ICANN staff to assist the 
task force in any legal definitions and the identification of any contract 
modifications that may be needed."


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>