RE: [ga] Ignoring the Rules

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us>]

Michael,

Does the fact that there are possibly some procedural items missing from the
Interim Report prevent anyone from commenting on what is out there?  I am
beginning to believe that you all love to argue about process and when it
comes to substance, you are all speechless.

If there are any items in the report that are missing, let me be the first
to apologize and say that we will take steps to correct it.  

Now that that is out of the way, can anyone comment on the substance of what
is there?  (This is plea #2)

Thanks.

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
[mailto:froomkin@law.miami.edu]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Neuman, Jeff
Cc: 'DannyYounger@cs.com'; ga@dnso.org; mcade@att.com
Subject: RE: [ga] Ignoring the Rules


If it's supposed to be in the interim to spur comment and discussion, what
is served by putting it in the final?  Other than creating a misleading
impression of debate?

On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Neuman, Jeff wrote:

> Danny, 
> 
> I am going to try to be brief here in my comments:
> 
> 1)  All of these items are being prepared for the final report (which will
> be available for public comment as well);

-- 
		Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                        -->It's hot here.<--
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html