ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Public comment period


Dear Marilyn & Tony

Time extension would be beneficial to get us all to review the final 
reports and will provide many of us ample of comment opportuinity 
in order to get all the angles covered well.

Regards,

Asaad Alnajjar
CEO Millennium Inc.
Los Angeles, CA, USA




At Monday, 2 December 2002, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

>We have had two major task force final reports released on the same 
day.  We 
>have been given a mere week to offer up public comments.  This is 
>inappropriate, and I would ask Marilyn Cade and Tony Holmes to voluntarily 

>extend the comment period so that it accords with the recommendations 
in the 
>proposed bylaws -- twenty calendar days.  
>
>It comes down to this -- is it more important to respect the public's 
right 
>to proper notice-and-comment provisions that offer a sufficient 
amount of 
>time to digest and respond to material that has been prepared over 
the course 
>of eighteen months, or is it more important to meet an extremely short 
>arbitrary deadline that has been established for the sole convenience 
of 
>those who seek to deal with these particular issues at the upcoming 
Amsterdam 
>session?
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>







--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>