ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [ga] Open call to join


At 21:57 31/12/02, eric@hi-tek.com wrote:
>My question remains;
>Why has the Panel not done anything toward making this at-large into a
>formal group
>as they were elected to do? And why do the refuse to answer this
>question?


Because whatever/wherever you want to incorporate you need to tell what 
for. This means a mission and a working style. Up to now no one was ever 
able to sort it out. The Richard/Vittorio/Joop/Judyth proposition may help 
to address that. We had a first try as a single standalone group (Joanna), 
then an ICANN lobby (Hans) now we may perhap's proceed to the support of an 
@large diversified community (we still have to sort out the 
differing  American Fededral top-down ("umbrella") and the European 
Confederal peer tro peer ("concerting relations/"concertance") concepts, we 
see in the proposed wordings.
jfc


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>