[ga] Re: .BIZ RDRP Disputes

["Max Meier" <maxmeier@lawyer.com>]

WIPO and NeuLevel fail to answer serious questions.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Domain.Disputes" <Domain.Disputes@wipo.int>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:52:16 +0100
To: <maxmeier@lawyer.com>
Subject: Re: .BIZ RDRP Disputes

> Dear Mr. Meier,
> 
> we have contacted NeuLevel, the .BIZ registry, with regard to your question and will come back to you shortly.
> 
> Sincerely,
> WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
> 
> >>> "Max Meier" <maxmeier@lawyer.com> 11/12/02 02:22PM >>>
> Dear Sir or Madam,
> 
> In the RDRP policy there is no provision which requires the Complainant to hold an identical or a confusing similar trademark to request a transfer of a disputed domain name. 
> How can you as a Dispute Resolution Providers make this a requirement? 
> 
> According to your site... "Single RDRP Complaints can be filed by any person or entity. However, if the Complainant requests transfer of the domain name, it will have to establish, as under the UDRP, that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights."
> http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/gtld/biz/rdrp/index.html 
> 
> There is no such provision in the RDRP policy.
> How can you legitimate this requirement?
> 
> 
> I am waiting for your reply.
> Thank you!
> 
> 
> Yours sincerely,
> Max Meier

-- 
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html