<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] New TLD White Paper released
Joe, et al,
There is no reason why this should not happen simultaneously.
Both points are well taken.
It is like being a Buddhist Christian - they are not mutually exclusive.
e
Joe Baptista wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Rodrigo Orenday Serrato wrote:
>
> > What about the right of a nation over the ccTLD that corresponds to it
> > (provided that the ccTLD in question in fact corresponds to a nation-state).
> >
> > As Prfr. Froomkin put it in one of his papers (please note that this is not
> > an exact quote), sovereign nations may come to hold the position that
> > control over the ccTLD assigned to them is an "appurtenance" of their
> > sovereignty. Spain and Colombia have, for example.
> >
> > I do beleive that the right of sovereign nations, and other subjects of
> > public international law, to control their ccTLD should be acknowledged.
>
> Nations have no default right to cctlds. I have no idea why we have all
> fallen for this nonsense. If a nation wants it's own tld then it should
> set it up. The cctlds belong to the managers who recieved the assignments
> from postel. Leave it that way and create tlds for nations who want them.
>
> regards
> joe baptista
>
> Joe Baptista - only at www.baptista.god
>
> http://latinos.nomad/
>
> >
> >
> > Atentamente, Regards
> > Rodrigo Orenday Serratos
> >
> >
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]En nombre de Eric
> > Dierker
> > Enviado el: Sábado, 22 de Marzo de 2003 06:24 PM
> > Para: jefsey@club-internet.fr
> > CC: steinle@smartvia.de; baptista@dot-god.com; ga@dnso.org
> > Asunto: Re: [ga] New TLD White Paper released
> >
> >
> > I can show you! Try, it.com.vn
> > I do not buy into the TLD garbage but I buy into ccTLD market.
> > We must back it up with secondary market contributers.
> > e
> > > At 04:08 20/03/03, steinle@smartvia.de wrote:
> > >>Please show me only one case where your sole rights in a TLD was
> > >>acknowledged.
> > >
> > > No one has right in an TLD, as no one as right into a nation.
> > > Exept to some extend its registrants.
> > >
> > > That ICANN has accepted an absurd economical model
> > > where people buy their own name or lose them, does not
> > > change anything to this.
> > >
> > > Please eread RFC 920 and 1591.
> > > jfc
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> >
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|