ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] A puzzle about ccTLDs and sovereignty


Jefsey and all former DNSO GA members or other interested parties,

  Lets face the facts or truth here.  ICANN, and especially
Joe Simms and Louis Touton don't like the fact that other parties,
other than ICANN are selling their ccTLD's to the highest bidder
or those ccTLD's are in the hands of contracted entities that
ICANN doesn't like and cannot impose of convince to abide
by quasi standards that that are not only not supported by
those operators of most of the ccTLD registries but most
stakeholders as well.

  Hence ICANN through Stuart Lynn especially, have delayed
introduction of desired gTLD's until ICANN has effective
control of ALL ccTLD's thereby creating an arbitrary
shortfall of demand for other TLD name spaces.

  Abrogating free market place demand or forces and
trying to thwart ISO with respect to ccTLD's is not
a wise or useful method of applying pressure to
the pent up registry industry industry at the behest
of the IP interests singing the song of chaos if not
strictly controlled by entities of their approval..

  This is no way to properly manage a Public Resource,
and is akin to a dictatorial regiment.

J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:

> At 18:34 28/03/03, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> >In other words, if the Tuvalu government wants to manage .tv for
> >commercial purposes, it is their right to do so. But it must be a
> >delegation that comes from the Tuvalu government, not by a private body
> >like IANA or ICANN. (No, I don't imply that the current TV-NIC acts
> >without the Tuvalu authorization, it's just an example)
>
> Dear Roberto,
> even this doesnot stand. Because you want to establish by your own a rule
> supersedeing the State of Tuvalu's sovereignty. This can only be done
> through international treaty. State of Tuvalu is sovereign in accepting or
> not that a private body uses ".tv" for whatever purpose, should it consider
> ".tv" a Tuvalu property.
>
> Why an international treaty. Only because ".tv" can be both conseived as a
> service to the registrants (for them to be happy with a ".tv" name) and to
> the Internet users (to indentify a name as belonging to a Tuvalu interest
> or resident). Both possibilities were initially supported. The second one
> was killed by the "international TLD business" (Mike Roberts)
> created/enforced by ICANN.
> jfc
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 129k members/stakeholders strong!)
================================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>