Re: [ga] Re: [centr-ga] Re: [nc-deletes] FW: [council] Concerns Regarding Report of DeletesTask Force

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

What you have written here suggests that the registrar owns a domain name as 
something seperate from an IP address.  I find this illusive if not down 
right wrong.
However in the current state of rules, I cannot show otherwise.
As a consultant advisor to a contractor registrar I still cannot tell with 
certainty what property rights are owned in a domain name regitration.
Litigation is like art, it reflects life it does not control it.
Even outstanding precedence can be altered by developments and new customs 
and dealings in trade and practices.  Pondits and talking heads should be 
wise to not set rules in their writings but only reflect rules of order.
e

> <John Berryhill wrote>
> The comments are worth considering for a few days, but certainly would
> have been more helpful if they were submitted during the comment
> period.
> 
> There is one error where the comments are seriously misguided, however,
> and that relates to expiration of a domain name during litigation.
> 
> To understand this central flaw in much of the comments, one must
> remember what a domain name is.
> 
> A domain name is the incident of a contract between the registrar and
> the registrant.  

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html