<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] ALAC on ccNSO
Vittorio,
You wrote: "The Interim At Large Advisory Committee supports the idea of a
Country
Code Names Supporting Organization as devised in the Report [referring to the
Fifth Supplemental Implementation Report of ICANN's Evolution and Reform
Committee]". http://forum.icann.org/mail-archive/alac/msg00247.html
May I ask why the ALAC is endorsing the ERC/ccNSO Assistance Group
recommendations instead of the "Resolutions adopted by the ccTLD Managers
meeting in Rio" posted at
http://www.wwtld.org/meetings/Rio/ccNSO_resolution.html ?
How did you arrive at your conclusion?
In your view, why should users support a proposition that calls for three
top-down appointed members selected by the Nominating Committee to meddle in
the affairs of this SO? Do you honestly believe that users are in favor of
these top-down mechanisms (such as you have in the ALAC)?
By the way, why did you agree to five top-down appointees being placed on the
ALAC? ...or do you just automatically agree to everything that ICANN imposes?
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|