Re: you have missed the point (was RE: [ga] UDRP dead?...)

[Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

Title:

Brett,

The reason expressed by Karl Auerbach is reason enough IMO.  If a speedy
new registration and resolution for a given domain is required, the use of
the 'wildcard' forwarding technique would indeed hamper timely propogation.
 

As an end user, that makes me care enough to make sure you and others know
about it.  

--Sotiris

Bret Fausett wrote:
> So how would you grade the wildcard issue? Is there any reason that end users should care? (I`m hard-pressed for a good reason to care.)
>
>      -- Bret 
>
> > It seems like the at-large/general network user may take issue with how
> > icann/iana are preforming their primary function "technical administration
> > of the contracted gTLDs"
> >
> > Its time we started grading icann on its ability to manage technical
> > things, thats its mandate with DoC.
> >
> >   
>
>
> ~~
> Bret Fausett    http://www.lextext.com/
> Hancock, Rothert & Bunshoft, LLP
> (via Sharp Zaurus Linux PDA)
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

-- 
-----------

"The science of jurisprudence regards the state and power as the
ancients regarded fire- namely, as something existing absolutely.
But for history, the state and power are merely phenomena, just as for
modern physics fire is not an element but a phenomenon.

From this fundamental difference between the view held by history
and that held by jurisprudence, it follows that jurisprudence can tell
minutely how in its opinion power should be constituted and what
power- existing immutably outside time- is, but to history's questions
about the meaning of the mutations of power in time it can answer
nothing."
				     --Leo Tolstoy, "War and Peace"