Re: [ga] Who speaks for the ALAC?

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

On Saturday, May 31, 2003, at 03:52  AM, Vittorio Bertola wrote:

> On Fri, 30 May 2003 11:12:24 -0500, you wrote:
>
>>> I don't think that the ALAC is "acquiescing" to anything - especially
>>> if you have a look at some of the things we said in the last weeks. 
>>> We
>>> try to do our best to keep up with all policy proceedings and at the
>>> same time go on building the regional representation mechanism (and
>>> still have a job, a life and so on); and we want to be constructive,
>>> so we usually try to focus our comments on current issues and 
>>> specific
>>> points. But we are not afraid to speak when we think it's necessary.
>>>
>> Although grammatically correct, technically speaking, "we" should be
>> replace with "Denise, Esther and I"
>
> This is not correct. You may visit
>
> http://forum.icann.org/mail-archive/alac/
>
> and see for yourself that almost all the members of the Committee
> participate actively in discussions. Also, Thomas Roessler and Wendy
> Seltzer are our liaisons to the GNSO and its task forces, and they are
> the authors of a good part of our documents.

 From what I understand the Registrars constituency allow it's members 
to nominate and vote for it's representatives.

Likewise many others.

When did I get a chance to nominate you, or vote for you? Or vote NOT 
for you?

And yet you profess to be speaking on my behalf?

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html