<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] "constituency" and "GNSO"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sotiris Sotiropoulos" <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
To: "Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>
> Who can still say that domain name registrants do not need a
> Constituency of their own in the GNSO?
====================================
With all due respect, when you use terms like "constituency" and "GNSO" you are buying into a structure
that is pre-determined to be biased **against** the "domain name registrants".
That just helps to perpetuate "the Big Lie Society", which un-educated netizens have no idea they are endorsing.
Why would that be good for domain name registrants ?
Jim Fleming
http://www.DOT-BIZ.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|