ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] WHOIS accuracy, and name deletions


Rodrigo and all Former DNSO GA members or other interested parties,

Rodrigo Orenday Serrato wrote:

> 15 days seems more than fair a period prior deletion.

  Seems to whom?  How do you arrive at this conclusion?

>
>
> I don't know how it is elsewhere, but in Mexico one has 9 working days to
> reply to a law suit, period after which you would find yourself in default
> should you fail to reply; in the case of suits for Amparo (sort of our
> habeas corpus, but much broader), we have the exact same 15 days, tops, in
> order to file a suit.

  Thankfully I and most other registrants do not reside in Mexico nor
hold .MX domain names. However I do like to visit different locals in
Mexico from time to time. As I understand it, Presedente Fox is in
process of realigning many of the past long held administrations of
Mexico's legal precepts to something more reasonable and globally
expectable in accordance with GATT and NAFTA conscripts.
I hope that he is broadly successful in this effort lest Mexico face
in a few years in ecommerce, a debacle of very large proportions.
It would displease me and some of our INEGroup members greatly
should he fail.  I am also pretty sure that the Bush Administration
would also find such a requirement as you suggest for the small
ecommerce businessman, to be far less that optimum as well...

>
>
> Atentamente, Regards
> Rodrigo Orenday Serratos
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]En nombre de Joop
> Teernstra
> Enviado el: Martes, 07 de Enero de 2003 06:58 PM
> Para: Thomas Roessler; George Kirikos
> CC: discuss-list@opensrs.org; ga@dnso.org
> Asunto: Re: [ga] WHOIS accuracy, and name deletions
>
> At 12:57 a.m. 8/01/2003, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> >On 2003-01-07 02:15:01 -0800, George Kirikos wrote:
> >
> > > Folks might not be aware of discussions going on in the WHOIS
> > > accuracy task force of the DNSO/GNSO. See:
> >
> > > http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-whois/Arc00/msg00806.html
> >
> > > for instance.
> >
> > > Am I the only one who is concerned that a legitimately held name
> > > might be deleted due to a simple failure to respond within 15
> > > days?
> >
> >You're certainly not alone with that concern.  But the 15 day period
> >isn't new at all -- it's current policy, RAA 3.7.7.2.
>
> And that illustrates how necessary it is that Individual registrants are
> actively represented in the policy making process.
> 15 Days can easily result in oppression. There must be safeguards.
>
> If targeting "bad guys" is the justification, we are in for a lot more
> "summary takedowns".
>
> Such unchecked powers must not be given to commercial registrars.
>
> -joop-
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>