Re: [ga] Icann At Large Poll rejects RALOs and ICANN's new AtLargestructure

["Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>]

Hi Joe:

The membership list can be viewed at www.IcannatLarge.com or .org

For a convenient breakdown, by country, I've listed the membership here:

http://www.theinternetchallenge.com/memberswholelistnames.htm

Or view by Region, here:

http://www.theinternetchallenge.com/memberswholelist.htm

Have a nice day -

Richard H

----- Original Message -----
From: Joe Baptista <baptista@dot-god.com>
To: Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>
Cc: <ga@dnso.org>; <marc@fuchsia.bijt.net>
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Icann At Large Poll rejects RALOs and ICANN's new
AtLargestructure


>
> On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> > 171 people took part in the ballot.
>
> who are these 170 people or alledged 1000?  is there a membership
> list.  i have more domain owners then you have members.  and you consider
> that representative?
>
> who are these lost soals?
>
> regards
> joe baptista
>
> >
> > This was virtually the same as our last ballot to confirm our name, when
170
> > people voted.
> >
> > >From this you can deduce that, even though there were a dozen quite
detailed
> > questions, the core of our membership wanted to get involved.
> >
> > They also expressed a clear majority wish for more polls and regular
polls.
> >
> > Clearly, with a membership of over 1000, you could ask "Where are the
rest?"
> >
> > But I think any group like ours attracts sympathetic watchers who want
to be
> > members without getting drawn in too deep.
> >
> > Everyone can draw their own conclusions.
> >
> > The results are informative, as far as they go.
> >
> > They will help our organisation determine its future, and they are a
green
> > light to much more co-operation with other At Large orgs around the
world,
> > to build a coalition outside the unpopular ICANN structure. They also
> > effectively stop any support from our organisation for the RALOs dead in
its
> > tracks.
> >
> > As far as the list of names to trust/mistrust goes, I did not see this
in
> > advance, but I find it an interesting indicator of opinion with regard
to
> > Denise Michel and Esther Dyson's initiative. I don't say this as any
> > personal criticism of the people involved. I just think that (taken with
the
> > other votes) it demonstrates the opposition that exists to a "top down"
> > ICANN agenda.
> >
> > At least we have actively initiated a "bottom up" process.
> >
> > It's a shame ICANN won't do the same. It's a shame they chose to EXPEL
the
> > elected representatives on their Board. No wonder the grassroots of the
At
> > Large don't trust them.
> >
> > Richard Henderson
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Marc Schneiders <marc@fuchsia.bijt.net>
> > To: <ga@dnso.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:17 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ga] Icann At Large Poll rejects RALOs and ICANN's new At
> > Largestructure (fwd)
> >
> >
> > > I do not see the results published. I would be interested in the
number
> > > who voted.
> > >
> > > --
> > > [04] We value you like our close relations.
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
>
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html