ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Esther Dyson..... - a modest clarification


On 14:01 10/02/03, Esther Dyson said:
>yes... but input in person carries a lot more weight than input through 
>postings.  I believe having a physical presence will make a 
>difference.  Now the challenge is funding to get the people there!  I.e. 
>the ICANNwatch phrase "meaningless input" is precisely orthogonal (and 
>also contrary) to what I meant:  "influential input," delivered in person.

Esther,
I accept the weight of this. But we have two options.

- the airline network option you propose: making people to go at ICANN 
meetings, increasing the digital divide (most of the international return 
flights+stay keeps level with the local cost of a PC).

- the internet network option I supported when a candidate to the BoD: to 
enter in the bylaws, and in the day to day working life of ICANN, an 
on-line community management tool we would design together to be of real 
use (Estonian Gov example, if I understand well: you probably know better). 
Should such a system (we name it "Concerter" in the dot-root project, 
develop across the governance, it would become a common culture and carry a 
lot of weight too.

As a VC this is probably a good niche for you. The need is universal. You 
would be far more influential in coordinating an effort there; through a 
good business plan, than wasting time in ICANN. Why would you not 
capitalize on your "meetup" involvement: could have been a good tool had 
not these people killed its network governance support capacity.

Sep/11 and GWB's Iraq folly may lead us to the second option anyway, in 
hurting badly the air transportation industry and the whole world in general.
jfc



>Esther
>
>At 09:38 PM 2/9/2003, Gene Marsh wrote:
>>Esther,
>>
>>I believe there is more angst about how ICANN reached its "consensus"
>>during policy creation.  The input stream is largely seen as pouring water
>>into sand, while the board accepts policies for vote based on apparent fiat
>>or influenced views.
>>
>>Gene...
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From:   Esther Dyson [SMTP:edyson@edventure.com]
>>Sent:   Sunday, February 09, 2003 8:09 PM
>>To:     Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
>>Cc:     ga@dnso.org
>>Subject:        Re: [ga] Esther Dyson..... - a modest clarification
>>
>>To quote the Register more fully:
>>
>>"We want public input into ICANN", she said. "We've got a mechanism where
>>it can have a seat on the task forces, liaisons to working groups, be part
>>of the policy making process - I see that in many ways as more important
>>than having a seat on the board."
>>
>>That part in fact is accurate (though I couldn't swear to it word for
>>word).  I do in fact believe this.  The ability to have input *when policy
>>is made* - rather than later when it is voted on by the board - is very
>>important, I believe.  The board's votes are usually fairly general; all
>>the details and nuances happen in the implementation, either in the
>>policies that are put *to* the board, or the ones that are created
>>afterwards at its direction.  (PS- This is not new, from me, anyway.)  I
>>think it's fair to say that much of what distresses people about ICANN is
>>not the board votes, but how they are implemented.
>>
>>Having seats on the board is *also* a good thing, to be sure, and one that
>>matters, but a few seats on the board would probably make less difference
>>than some active involvement in committee work.
>>
>>Note: I did not say "in all ways."  nor did I say "meaningless input" (as
>>in the ICANNwatch headline). The kind of input I mean is input that has an
>>impact, because it is delivered by credible individuals making good points
>>in the face-to-face conversations where policy details and compromises are
>>hammered out.
>>
>>What I *did* say was more focused on the importance of fixing ICANN rather
>>than abandoning it, and some of the difficulties of doing so.  (plus some
>>history!)
>>
>>Esther
>>
>>
>>
>>At 05:06 PM 2/8/2003, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
>> >Meanwhile, corrections to
>> >http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl?sid=03/02/06/2324259&mode=nested
>> >would be welcomed -- that quote didn't sound like you...
>> >
>> >On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Esther Dyson wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Two:  Don't believe everything you read. What I actually said was quite
>> > > different, and not that new.  Please do read Oxford's precis of the
>> > > conference when it is posted.  Or you can read what I wrote for the
>>Wall
>> >
>> >--
>> >                 Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
>> >A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
>> >U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
>> >+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
>> >                         -->It's warm here.<--
>>
>>
>>
>>Esther Dyson                    Always make new mistakes!
>>chairman, EDventure Holdings
>>writer, Release 3.0 (on Website below)
>>edyson@edventure.com
>>1 (212) 924-8800    --   fax  1 (212) 924-0240
>>104 Fifth Avenue (between 15th and 16th Streets; 20th floor)
>>New York, NY 10011 USA
>>http://www.edventure.com
>>
>>The conversation continues..... at
>>http://www.edventure.com/conversation/
>>
>>PC Forum 2003 - March 23 to 25, Phoenix
>>Who? what? where? Data comes alive!
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
>Esther Dyson                    Always make new mistakes!
>chairman, EDventure Holdings
>writer, Release 3.0 (on Website below)
>edyson@edventure.com
>1 (212) 924-8800    --   fax  1 (212) 924-0240
>104 Fifth Avenue (between 15th and 16th Streets; 20th floor)
>New York, NY 10011 USA
>http://www.edventure.com
>
>The conversation continues..... at
>http://www.edventure.com/conversation/
>
>PC Forum 2003 - March 23 to 25, Phoenix
>Who? what? where? Data comes alive!
>
>
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
>
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/03

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>