<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] WHOIS data on .org domains
Danny,
No problem, you have clarified an number of misunderstandings that I have
had in the past. In theory that is how the GA list is suppose to work,
people sharing collective knowledge to prevent other people from having to
reinventing the wheel. However, as most list subscribers can attest it does
not always work that way :-)
Take it easy,
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DannyYounger@cs.com [mailto:DannyYounger@cs.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:56 AM
> To: michael@palage.com; ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] WHOIS data on .org domains
>
>
> Michael,
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
>
> Re: << I agree that the Whois output from the thick registry is very
> confusing to a normal user. >>
>
> I guess that as a typical confused user I continue to fail to
> understand the
> justification for all the extra fields that appear in the thick
> WHOIS. Why
> should anyone, other than my own registrar, have to know my
> billing contact
> information? Why does my expectation of privacy continue to be eroded in
> this ICANN process?
>
> As far as I recall, the RAA says nothing about making billing
> data available
> for publication. When did the DNSO approve a change in this policy?
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|