<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: .BIZ RDRP Disputes
- To: Max Meier <maxmeier@lawyer.com>, Don Evans <DEvans@doc.gov>, "Nancy J. Victory" <nvictory@ntia.doc.gov>, Robin Layton <RLayton@ntia.doc.gov>, cathy Handley <chandley@ntia.doc.gov>, Clyde Ensslin <censslin@ntia.doc.gov>, Kathy Smith <KSMITH@ntia.doc.gov>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Re: .BIZ RDRP Disputes
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 21:49:34 -0800
- CC: "Domain.Disputes" <Domain.Disputes@wipo.int>, ga@dnso.org, Christian Wichard <christian.wichard@wipo.int>, Tsutomu Takahashi <tsutomu.takahashi@wipo.int>, Jeff Neuman <Jeff.Neuman@NeuLevel.com>, Jeff Neuman <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us>
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <20030219164535.2769.qmail@mail.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
Max and all former DNSO GA members,
Nuelevel has been a long time, well documented, and continual plague
upon the Registrants and internet community sense MdR 2000. Even
Jeff Nueman, doesn't return calls sense my post to this list several days
ago regarding other questionable activities that our members and .BIZ
registrants have reported.
Max Meier wrote:
> WIPO and NeuLevel fail to answer serious questions.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Domain.Disputes" <Domain.Disputes@wipo.int>
> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:52:16 +0100
> To: <maxmeier@lawyer.com>
> Subject: Re: .BIZ RDRP Disputes
>
> > Dear Mr. Meier,
> >
> > we have contacted NeuLevel, the .BIZ registry, with regard to your question and will come back to you shortly.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
> >
> > >>> "Max Meier" <maxmeier@lawyer.com> 11/12/02 02:22PM >>>
> > Dear Sir or Madam,
> >
> > In the RDRP policy there is no provision which requires the Complainant to hold an identical or a confusing similar trademark to request a transfer of a disputed domain name.
> > How can you as a Dispute Resolution Providers make this a requirement?
> >
> > According to your site... "Single RDRP Complaints can be filed by any person or entity. However, if the Complainant requests transfer of the domain name, it will have to establish, as under the UDRP, that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights."
> > http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/gtld/biz/rdrp/index.html
> >
> > There is no such provision in the RDRP policy.
> > How can you legitimate this requirement?
> >
> >
> > I am waiting for your reply.
> > Thank you!
> >
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> > Max Meier
>
> --
> __________________________________________________________
> Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
> http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 129k members/stakeholders strong!)
================================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|