ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] ALAC comments on proposed Bylaws modifications


If the Internet is truly global, and also democratic (which is an inherint
misconception) then one person, one vote.

Todd

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>
To: "Vittorio Bertola" <vb@bertola.eu.org>; <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 1:44 PM
Subject: RE: [ga] ALAC comments on proposed Bylaws modifications


> "Any RALO must through its at-large
>           structures or through direct membership, be open for
>           participation of all individual Internet users who are
>           citizens or residents of countries within the RALO's
>           Geographic Region (as defined in Section 5 of Article VI)."
>
> Oh that's good. I get to join two RALO's and have a vote in both regions.
> Regards,
> Joanna
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Vittorio
> > Bertola
> > Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 8:21 PM
> > To: ga@dnso.org
> > Subject: [ga] ALAC comments on proposed Bylaws modifications
> >
> >
> > Comment to the proposed Bylaws modifications
> > by the At Large Advisory Committee
> > --------------------------------------------
> >
> > The ALAC has had a limited amount of (email) discussion about the
> > proposed bylaw changes. Although not all ALAC members have addressed
> > this issues, those that have would like to leave the bylaw language
> > concerning At-Large Structures and Regional At-Large Organizations as
> > open as possible, with the understanding that details will be
> > addressed in the RALO's MoUs with ICANN, and that the ALAC and ICANN
> > will be responsible for ensuring that the MoU meets basic criteria for
> > involving individual Internet users and advancing their interests
> > within ICANN.
> >
> > While the ALAC wants to make clear and irrevocable that the RALOs and
> > At-Large Structures represent the voices of individuals, not
> > organizations, the Committee does not want a formalism in the bylaws
> > to block participation of groups that genuinely represent individuals
> > but also accept organizational/corporate members.  The ALAC
> > acknowledges that ICANN needs to be mindful of two possible scenarios:
> > an individuals-only policy blocks ISOC chapters and other individual
> > participation, or lack of such a policy permits some company to
> > "organize" an At-Large Structure and capture its RALO.  The ALAC
> > thinks the problem of preventing organizational capture should be left
> > to the RALOs in the first instance; and that too detailed a policy may
> > hamper the groups most effectively representing individuals.
> >
> > In addition to some ISOC chapters, there is concern that some of the
> > groups listed below, which could be considered potential candidates
> > for At-Large Structures, could not fully participate under the
> > proposed bylaws (note: these are hypothetical examples and do not
> > indicate any commitment or interest on the part of these
> > organizations):
> >
> >   a.. Association for Internet Professionals (AIP)
> > (http://www.association.org/) has both individual and corporate
> > memberships
> >   b.. ISOC ECC and CECUA have only organizational members and have
> > asked to be included as At-Large Structures (although it is not clear
> > why they should receive this delegation rather than each of their
> > members being delegated an ALS)
> >   c.. www.stikom.edu - appears to provide individuals with news,
> > education, and community discussion on issues relevant to At-Large,
> > but does not have memberships
> >   d.. LatinoamerICANN (http://www.latinoamericann.derecho.org.ar) is
> > an apendix of the Alfa-Redi Society, which is an international
> > membership-only society of lawyers specializing in computing law
> > (http://www.alfa-redi.org); to members LatinoamerICANN provides
> > information on the DNS and related issues.
> >   e.. Arab Knowledge Management Society (www.akms.org) - non profit
> > education service addressing "digital divide issues" with no
> > memberships
> >   f.. Institute for Study of Information Tech and Society --
> > http://communityconnections.heinz.cmu.edu/insites/about --  nonprofit
> > group for teaching, research and public outreach on information
> > technology policy, has corporate members/supporters
> >   g.. Consumers' Union/Consumer Policy Institute
> > (http://www.consumersunion.org/aboutcu/about.htm) and EPIC (Electronic
> > Privacy Information Center) (http://www.epic.org/) -- have some
> > compatible objectives, involve individuals in their policy development
> > and other activities, and could contribute to ICANN policy/issue
> > debates, but are not membership organizations
> >
> >   With this in mind, the ALAC offers the following draft language for
> > the Committee's consideration:
> >
> >           (h) Each RALO shall be comprised of self-supporting At-Large
> >           Structures within its Geographic Region, certified to meet
> >           the requirements of the RALO's Memorandum of Understanding
> >           with ICANN according to paragraph 4(i) of this Section.  If
> >           so provided by its memorandum of understanding with ICANN, a
> >           RALO may also have as its members individual Internet users
> >           who are citizens or residents of countries within the RALO's
> >           Geographic Region. Any RALO must, through its at-large
> >           structures or through direct membership, be open for
> >           participation of all individual Internet users who are
> >           citizens or residents of countries within the RALO's
> >           Geographic Region (as defined in Section 5 of Article VI).
> >
> >           (i) The ALAC is responsible for certifying organizations as
> >           meeting the criteria and standards for At-Large Structures.
> >           The criteria and standards for certification of At-Large
> >           Structures within a each Geographic Region shall be
> >           established by the Board and based on recommendations of the
> >           ALAC, so that each RALO is afforded the type of structure
> >           that best fits its Geographic Region's customs and
> >           characteristics. Those criteria and standards shall be
> >           stated in the Memorandum of Understanding between ICANN and
> >           the RALO for that Geographic Region. They shall ensure that
> >           At-Large Structures appropriately represent and involve
> >           individual Internet users who are citizens or residents of
> >           the RALO's geographical region. Decisions to certify or
> >           de-certify an At-Large Structure as meeting the applicable
> >           criteria and standards shall require a 2/3 vote of all the
> >           members of the ALAC and shall be subject to review according
> >           to procedures the Board may establish. The ALAC may also
> >           give advice as to whether a prospective At-Large Structure
> >           meets the applicable criteria and standards.
> >
> > Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
> >
> > The Interim At-Large Advisory Committee
> > --
> > vb.                  [Vittorio Bertola - vb [at] bertola.eu.org]<---
> > -------------------> http://bertola.eu.org/ <-----------------------
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>