[ga] [fwd] [nc-whois] DRAFT: policy options (from: roessler@does-not-exist.org)

[Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>]

FYI.  Comments are, as usual, welcome.
-- 
Thomas Roessler				<roessler@does-not-exist.org>

---

• To: nc-whois@dnso.org
• Subject: [nc-whois] DRAFT: policy options
• From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
• Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:25:29 +0100
• Delivered-To: roessler@voyager.does-not-exist.org
• Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 13:33:12 +0100
• Envelope-to: roessler-mobile@does-not-exist.net
• Mail-Followup-To: nc-whois@dnso.org
• Sender: owner-nc-whois@dnso.org
• User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i

Please find attached a first (and naturally incomplete) draft for
the third part of the privacy issues report. I've tried to keep this
as high-level as possible, while still outlining major options and
giving some hints at what should be taken into account in any
discussion of these options.

I hope that this is useful as a starting point for our discussions
today, and for further drafting.

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@does-not-exist.org>

whois-options.doc

---