<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: The telephone network and the internet (RE: [ga] ALAC commentson proposed Bylaws modifications)
Let's compare the who has power in ICANN against who has power in the ITU
and see which gives the internet user community a better chance at having
an impact:
ICANN Participants who have actual roles in the making of policy:
- Governments (frequently through self-appointed representatives without
actual credentials to represent their countries)
- Selected industries (ISPs, intellectual property owners,
DNS registrars/registries)
- Educational institutions (not educators, but the institutions)
- Non commercial organizations
- Regional IP address registries
ITU Participants who have actual roles in the making of policy:
- Governments (through formally appointed representatives)
- Selected industries
What is interesting is that the internet user community is present in
neither of these. (ICANN's nominating-committee/ALAC/ROLO/structure can
be dismissed - it is no more a meaninful vehicle for public participation
than were the village soviets in the USSR, the system upon which ICANN has
seemingly modeled its structure for public participation.)
Now, ICANN itself has made the claim that governments adequately represent
the interests of their citizens. If one believes this, than the internet
user community would naturally prefer the ITU over ICANN because:
a) The government role (and thus the representation of the internet users) is
less diluted by other interests in the ITU than it is in ICANN.
b) The governmental role in ITU is more formalized in the sense that
the representatives are clearly credentialed rather than ad hoc
self appointees. This means that there is a greater chance for
the national citizens to exert organized influence on their
representative.
--karl--
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|